This is not necessarily the current version of this TIP.
| TIP: | 295 |
| Title: | Enhance Arguments to lrange |
| Version: | $Revision: 1.3 $ |
| Author: | Andreas Leitgeb <avl at logic dot at> |
| State: | Draft |
| Type: | Project |
| Tcl-Version: | 8.5 |
| Vote: | Pending |
| Created: | Monday, 06 November 2006 |
| Keywords: | Tcl, lrange |
This TIP proposes an enhancement to lrange that lets it take more than one start-end index pair.
Sometimes you need to extract a non-continuous selection of elements from some list and build a new list from them. This requires the use of multiple calls to lrange and a surrounding concat to build the final list. However, since the following fails with a syntax error:
lrange {a b c d e f} 1 3 5 5
It would seem a reasonable extension for such a usage of lrange to return "b c d f". This would also make following pattern of usage feasible:
lassign [lrange $someList 0 2 10 12] var0 var1 var2 var10 var11 var12
The index-pairs should not be required to be in ascending order (this might be difficult to determine when one index is end-relative), or even disjoint. Even:
lrange {a b c d} 3 3 0 3 0 0
should be made legal and return "d a b c d a".
Change the implementation of lrange to accept any odd number of arguments, with semantics (upon supply of a correct number of arguments) equivalent to:
proc lrange-new {list args} {
set result [list]
foreach {start end} $args {
lappend result {*}[lrange $list $start $end]
}
return $result
}
Just the above mentioned procedure, at the moment.
Uwe Klein asks: "Should this support reverse ranges?"
This TIP is just about implicit concat'ing multiple lranges of the same list. Reversing lists doesn't fit here. (except if they are only constant small sized, then
lrange $list size size size-1 size-1 ... 1 1 0 0
would have that effect.
This document has been placed in the public domain.
This is not necessarily the current version of this TIP.